In an interview, Williams says he has now realised the song, made with Robin Thicke, contributed to sexism
Countless universities banned the song from being played at student events owing to the lyric I know you want it and a video in which the pair cavorted with topless models.
Williams told GQ that he didnt understand the uproar at first, because women appeared to like the song. So when there started to be an issue with it, lyrically, I was, like, What are you talking about? There are women who really like the song and connect to the energy that just gets you up. And I know you want it women sing those kinds of lyrics all the time. So its like, Whats rapey about that?
He said that he came to understand that the language used in the song is also used by men when taking advantage of a woman, and it doesnt matter that thats not my behaviour. Or the way I think about things. It just matters how it affects women.
Williams realised that we live in a chauvinist culture in our country. Hadnt realised that. Didnt realise some of my songs catered to that. So that blew my mind.
In 2013, Williams repeatedly refuted the suggestion that the song endorsed coercive behaviour. When you pull back and look at the entire song, the point is: Shes a good girl, and even good girls want to do things, and thats where you have the blurred lines, he told US music magazine Pitchfork. She expresses it in dancing because shes a good girl. People who are agitated just want to be mad, and I accept their opinion.
Despite the backlash, the song went to No 1 in countries around the world, including the UK and the US, and some critics disputed the interpretation of the lyrics.
It could definitely refer to the tired, overused good-girl-with-a-freaky-streak fantasy, wrote Slate magazines Jennifer Lai. Or, perhaps it really is about getting mixed signals from a lady who you think might be interested in doing the deed and then letting her know exactly where you stand so she can make the next move if she wants.
The dispute was not the end of Williams and Thickes strife regarding the song. In March 2015, a jury found Thicke and Williams liable for copyright infringement based on the hits similarity to Marvin Gayes Got to Give It Up. They were ordered to pay $7.4m to Gayes estate, followed by a second payment of $5m following a final judgment in December 2018.
The case has become a lightning rod for discussions about the limitations of musical inspiration.